Rated 2.5 out of 5Â by 50
Rated 5 out of 5Â by liv4comfort fantastic fit
Love these, the leg is loose enough that it does not bind. I have circulation problems and these are the best I've found. Please do not change them. I don't need a faux fly in front or double seams in back.
January 21, 2014
Rated 1 out of 5Â by ladyofthethorns Croth Too Wide - Bunches Uncomfortably
Whem I first pu these on, I thought, "oh, these feel nice" but after wearing them awhile, they were horribly uncomfortable. The crotch is much to wide (I measured 4inches at its widest) and since there is a double layer of fabric at the crotch, there was a huge wad pressing into all the tender parts.
I am wheelchair bound most of the day so sitting with these was down-right impossible. My walking is limited to about 10 feet at a time so I can't judge how else these would feel during a 'normal' day's wearing (such as riding up or stretching out).
December 28, 2013
Rated 1 out of 5Â by Nancy13 new design is bad
I had some of these before in an older design, they were great. My favorite underwear. I recently replaced them, and found that they have redesigned them, and they are horrible. They have a seam running straight up the middle in the back that was not there before. This seam creates a constant wedgie effect. It makes these very uncomfortable to wear. They also easily stretch out of shape. Just overall poor quality and design. If they were wise, they would bring back the old design.
December 9, 2013
Rated 1 out of 5Â by Nicky I have been trying to find a decent boy short since they discontinued a style in the last couple of years...not sure the style number. Every other style has FAILED. I hate the front seam on these, the cheap material and the fit!
November 30, 2013