Rated 3.2 out of 5Â by 43
Rated 1 out of 5Â by SeattleCustomer Oddly cut
There is something really off about the cut of these panties now. I ordered my regular size, but feel like I am wearing a thong.
What has happened to quality control....one pair was cut so wonky that it had to be thrown out.
I suspect that even if I went a size up, there would still be too little coverage in the most important places.
I do not recommend these - even though they are practically giving them away at this price.
November 30, 2013
Rated 3 out of 5Â by Pantiesnreview Runs small and crotch is not wide enough.
This panty runs small and the crotch is not wide enough. Someone needs to redesign this panty. It is not made for a larger woman. The jury is still out on the way they wash. Seems I got a lot of shrinkage.
December 21, 2013
Rated 1 out of 5Â by TATTHRASHER I am not happy alt all with the choices I had to chose from for
panties, You need to have more choices for sizes 11-14 We like to have nice panties too. NOT HAPPY WITH THIS COMPANY.....
February 1, 2014
Rated 1 out of 5Â by Ohio New sizing and fit awful
I have worn size 9 JMS panties for years. After reading review that these run small, I ordered size 10. Way too small. Returned for 11. Too small. Returned for 12. The 12 was smaller than the size 11 when I held them up together. The 12 was smaller than my older size 9 panties. These are just unacceptable. They are also too short. I want panties that go to my waist. These ride an inch or two below my belt button. Honestly... Larger women are not wearing low riding slacks... I understand wanting to offer an alternate fit option, but these are as much of a failure as New Coke was many years ago. Perhaps you should consider reintroducing these in Classic Fit for those of us who were buying these panties for years and years specifically because we liked the fit.
February 1, 2014